It's a devastating blow for rugby fans across America. Major League Rugby (MLR) is shrinking, and the future looks uncertain. The Utah Warriors, once a beacon of stability and success, have officially withdrawn from the 2026 season, leaving the league with just six teams. But here's where it gets controversial: is this the beginning of the end for MLR, or a necessary reset for long-term survival? Let's dive in.
The Warriors' departure follows a string of setbacks for the league. Miami, NOLA, and Houston have already exited, while San Diego and Los Angeles merged to form the California Legion. Now, with Utah's exit, only one of the original seven founding teams—the Seattle Seawolves—remains. The league's geographic footprint is shrinking, too, with the Legion as the sole West Coast representative alongside Chicago, New England, DC, and Charlotte.
This isn't just about numbers; it's about trust. MLR's decision to shorten the season and cut salaries has left fans and players alike questioning the league's direction. And this comes at a particularly tough time for American rugby. Just days after the national team's historic defeat, the domestic league is in disarray. It's a double whammy that has fans reeling.
On the surface, Utah's collapse is surprising. The Warriors seemed like a model franchise, boasting strong home support and a successful 2025 season that saw them return to the playoffs after a four-year drought. Their roster was stacked with talent, including ex-All Blacks hooker Liam Coltman, Tongan powerhouse Fetu’u Vainikolo, and Eagles legend Paul Lasike. So, what went wrong? The team's statement points to a failed investment deal, but it raises broader questions about the league's financial health.
MLR's recent rule change to limit overseas and Canadian players in favor of U.S.-eligible athletes was meant to boost financial viability. But will it be enough? Critics argue that reducing international talent could dilute the league's quality, while others see it as a necessary step to build a sustainable, homegrown rugby culture. Is this a bold move toward self-reliance, or a risky gamble that could backfire?
As MLR moves forward with fewer teams and a reshuffled map, the league's ability to regain public confidence will be tested. For now, fans are left wondering: Can MLR weather this storm, or is this the start of a downward spiral? What do you think? Is MLR on the right track, or are these changes a cause for concern? Let us know in the comments—we want to hear your take on this pivotal moment for American rugby.
